If you want to reword it to seem more authoratative, feel free to. Just letting people know that 4chan is back online and I have edited the page to reflect this. I'm not sure why it's in "controversy", though since it's more of a history thing. this odd self revert edit of mine was because I thought someone removed the link and I didn't see they just moved it. Any thoughts? William Ortiz 03:22, 24 October 2007 (UTC) Possibly, 4chanarchive may only be worth linking to as reference for histories of the site. Aside from 4chan itself, I think moot's blog about 4chan (provided it is run by moot) and the 4chan archive site (since it archives threads and isn't something like a wiki) are worthy links.
0 kommentar(er)
